Home Announcements Edgehill Park OMB Appeal Withdrawn
Edgehill Park OMB Appeal Withdrawn

Edgehill Park OMB Appeal Withdrawn


Edgehill ParkAfter months of work by the volunteer committee overseeing the OMB appeals, the group has had to withdraw from the appeal process. The appeal stems from the contentious decisions by Midland’s Council to re-zone one-third of Edgehill Park / Huronia Park to allow for commercial development of a Health Hub by Chigamik and Waypoint Centre for Mental Health,

The controversy first started last spring when Council decided to approve, in principal, the request by Waypoint and Chigamik, to secure the donation of town-owned land on which to build their Health Hub; where they planned to combine services offered in their separate locations in Midland into one central location.

After public meetings, deputations, a petition with 1800+ names followed by a divided but successful (6 for, 3 against) vote in Council, the group (which went on to become OurMidland.ca) filed an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  The rationale used by several councillors, including Councillor Strathearn, was simply that Midland has a “surplus of parkland”.  To add insult to injury, Councillor Strathearn pitched Council on buying land to build a new park in his ward the following week.

Fundraising began to offset the anticipated and unavoidable costs of mounting an appeal, which can be very expensive.  The Town engaged local law firm HGR Graham to defend their position while the proponents of the Health Hub (Waypoint & Chigamik) engaged their lawyers.

Hundreds more letters objecting to the re-zoning of the waterfront facing parkland, in addition to the petition were submitted to Simcoe County Council who, despite the petitions and letters, approved the Town of Midland’s application to amend their Official Plan to include the new zoning.

Throughout this process, the group sought and retained legal counsel, planning consultants and planning advice to help build the legal case needed at the OMB.  The OMB, a quasi-judicial entity, does not take into consideration the “will of the community” or any moral issues surrounding conflicts of interest – and only rules on the legality of the process and Planning Act issues.

The costs of mounting the appeal were growing as the pressure to pick a date for the appeal grew closer.  The community helped out with approximately $2,200 in donations in cash, and online.  Sadly, the cost estimations to secure the expert witnesses and to finance the multi-day appeal climbed to between $25,000 and $50,000.  There just isn’t enough money in the bank to proceed – a fact that we’ve learned many Municipalities count on.

Accordingly, and after much deliberation, the committee reluctantly decided that it was not possible to raise the kind of money required to continue this process, and had no intention of simply allowing the appeal date to be set simply to “cause delay” to the Health Hub project or jeopardize its funding (which unnecessary delay could have done).

The group has always maintained its support for both Waypoint and Chigamik but its opposition to what it and many supporters see as nothing  more than an opportunistic land grab to meet the needs of their funding’s expiry date.

Notwithstanding that position, we wish the Heath Hub success and remain saddened that it will be built on the parkland.  Furthermore, we will be sure to remind Council that they promised that there was no intention to allow the Health Hub to “expand” onto more land as time goes on – a concern based on the Powerpoint slide presented to Council indicating their preference for Edgehill Park because of its “room for growth” and the fact that the current footprint does not adequately allow for enough parking for their staff and visitors (self-admitted).

Perhaps the saddest take-away for the community, is that despite the largest uprising in our local history, against a Town initiative, and the most signatures by local residents ever collected and presented to our council, that our elected officials charged forward with the initiative, not to be dissuaded by community outrage.

What does that say to to other concerned community members who oppose Town planning or decisions and show up with a dozen signatures and a deputation?  It says that even with 1/3 of the voters in Town on board, that Council will do what they intended to do all along.   After all, it only took less than a dozen concerned citizens to stop Council of the day from building the fire hall on that very same land…

We have had disillusioned community members ask us:

  • what good is a petition no matter how many names are on it?
  • what good does writing letters to council do?
  • what good comes of deputations to council when they will simply disregard the input, let it go through one ear and out the other, and do what they intended to do in the first place.

It seems that an agreement in principle is another way of saying it will be done.

We cannot offer much hope to those people other than to tell them to remember what has happened here, what has yet to happen and do what we all do on election day every four years.. vote those who failed you out of power and those who have shown leadership and responsiveness to your needs back in.

A warm thank you to all the community members who helped fight for the park and supported the campaign.  We are truly sorry that we cannot take this fight any further.

Click here to review our struggle and all the articles pertaining to Edgehill Park


Editorial Note: The views and opinions expressed in this and any article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of OurMidland.ca community news.  Research claims and form your own opinions.  All publication and participation must abide by our terms of use policy.


  1. Am very sorry…but not surprised…this was in the bag from day one…congrats to all who put up a good fight.

  2. Elected officials should represent their constituentd, not their own ideas. I hope pople remember at election time.

    1. As long as majority rules! All too often it is special interest that governs from the shadows while the will of the majority of the people is ignored.

    2. As mentionef a lot the majority wants the health pub, so be it, but not necessarily at that location, nothing wrong with leaving some historical green space, it is a sad day!

    3. I will make sure that people remember as soon as the next election is coming up no problem to spend a bit of money on some paper adds

  3. Let’s not forget that Stewart Strathearn (MidlandCommunity.ca founding member) had the audacity to ask Council for $250k to do a study and BUY land in his ward for a new park only a week after voting to give away Edgehill to special interest (Provincially funded organizations) citing that Midland had a SURPLUS of parkland. It’s on the record.

    James Tripp A park doesn’t have to be in constant use to be valuable to the community. Got any more waterfront facing parkland laying around? Seem they don’t make it anymore and yet we GIVE ours away in a deal cooked up by our former CAO and our former Mayor MacDonald who never declared any conflicts during any discussions or votes on this despite sitting as Chigamik’s chairman of the board for many years and lobbying council for land…

    All that is kosher with many people it seems…

    1. Like said, if it is the will of the majority, the true majority, then that is what the mandate should be.

      This is the type of situation that reaffirms my desire for referendum vote at the municipal level on local issues.

    2. You will NEVER see that. That means they will actually have to do the will of the electorate instead of token consideration before they do as they see fit. The MPUC is next. There is no stopping the madness it seems.

    3. I should add that this is the way that representational governance works.. this is no different than Provincial and Federal politics. The majority don’t vote… 5k did out of 17k locally… The majority don’t speak up or engage… The majority is content with being governed and it is the minority who actually move government to act one way or the other.

  4. Sorry to hear. Still not sure why parkland needs to be used for a health hub that is proposing growth and the Edgehill site according to the twin will not be allowed to provide growth. The town will have its feet held to the fire on this one in the future.

  5. Wow guys, that really sucks. Money makes the world go round and the lawyers rich. It would have been nice to see this case go through the OMB if you had the money. Well, you put up a good fight and you had thousands behind you… too bad that took a back seat to special interests.


  7. The OMB are nothing but a political group of CROOKS anyway!! They rip off the little guy, like they did to my parents, letting people cross YOUR property to get to their property. That’s trespassing in my dictionary!! That’s why I say the town would have won!! We need to trow them out and get some people that LISTEN to BOTH sides of the story!! Rant over, thanks.

Leave a Reply

Edgehill Park OMB Appeal Withdrawn

%d bloggers like this: